Messing Around in Books

A random sampling of my reading over the last week.

The Department of Sensitive Crimes: A Detective Varg Novel

Here we have Alexander McCall Smith on form in a series of gentle tales about injustices dealt with by the thoughtful Inspector Varg, his colleague Anna Bengstdottor, and the rather trying Blomquist. We first encounter Inspector Varg having a session with his therapist, where the aim is ‘to bring to the surface the things that are below the surface’ which one could say is Varg’s whole raison d’etre. He ponders many things; can dogs lip read, do all Finnish people look alike, should a policeman read Kierkegard? He is the kind of philosophical, slightly sad, but truly good character we know and love from other books by McCall Smith. And I quite like that this is a gentle take-off of Scandi noir, in the least noirish way possible. I will be reading more of Inspector Varg.

The Second Worst Restaurant in France

Another McCall Smith which gets off to a rather good start with Paul Stuart, a popular food writer, having a falling out with his girl-friend over her Siamese cats, Hamish and Mrs Macdonald, when he suggests they take her for granted.

He now realised just how far he had strayed into sensitive territory, “Indifferent?” said Gloria, her tone now one of decided reproof…”Hamish and Mrs Macdonald…-actually love me.”

She decides that Paul needs to know her cats better and brings them to live with him, which makes his work quite impossible. He accepts an offer of a holiday in France with his cousin Chloe, and this is where the book lost me. Because there is a great deal too much of Chloe. We have Chloe discoursing on some of her five husbands, on her lovers, on her views on food, her views on Marie Antionette, on art, and everything under the sun. She is tiresome. As a character she seems to be used to pad out a slight little story and ends up being deeply annoying. Not my favourite McCall Smith.

Then I went to my densely packed bookshelves and drew forth an old favourite. Iris Murdoch has got me through many a dark hour. We Gerts often call her ‘Enid Blyton for grown-ups.’ I couldn’t remember anything about An Unofficial Rose, but I found it starts at a funeral and quickly introduces the usual caste of people loving or hating each other, with secret lives and unfulfilled dreams. But had the writing always been this bad? The descriptive passages crammed with adverbs and adjectives, the many sentences beginning ‘he felt’ The tedious characters, the archness… Here is a chunk so you can get the idea.

Ann’s mind was out of her control. She had never had this sensation before and it afflicted her with a sort of sea-sickness. She was racing somewhere so fast she could no longer focus her eyes. Her images of those she loved, her image of herself, seemed lurid, inflated and blurred. Everything was getting larger and hazier at the same time. She wished she could rest; but the machine only whirled the faster, dazzling her and inducing a continual nausea.

Ann was by now dreadfully in love with Felix. From the moment when, after his own declaration, she had realized with a shocked surprise that she was ready to fall in love, the descent of her mind into love had taken place with the power of an avalanche.

Will she? Won’t she? Do we care? I don’t think so.

Then how about a good old-fashioned detective story. Whose Body, by Dorothy L Sayers, a highly regarded writer with a popular detective Lord Peter Whimsey?

But, oh dear, what is this I am reading, about a ‘Hebrew’ going missing? And why is the architect referred to as ‘a little architect’? And why does he speak like this?

He was quite rude to me, my lord-I may say I didn’t like his manner at all. “If you’ve got anything definite to accuse Gladys or me of, Inspector,” I said to him, “Bring it forward, that’s what you have to do”, I said ,”but I’ve yet to learn that you’re paid to be rude to a gentleman in his on ‘ouse- house.” Reely’, said Mr Thipps, growing quite pink on the top of his head, ‘he regular roused me, my lord, and I’m a mild man as a rule.

The rampant snobbishness made this book unreadable for me, which is a pity as I had just bought this and three other books by D L Sayers as a treat for myself. I might still try Gaudy Night, but I am not optimistic.

Fortunately, I have many more books up my sleeve and have just finished and enjoyed Spring by Ali Smith and am now reading The Master by Colm Toibin, which is superb.

18 thoughts on “Messing Around in Books

  1. Much as I have loved Dorothy Sayers, I think it likely that she would be snobbish on a rereading. I haven’t ventured it. So Wind in the Willows was not on your list for the week?

    1. Oh dear I haven’t thought of that. I did try a P G Wodehouse and had to put it down. I also watched some of the first episode of a new series of Enid Blyton’s Malory Towers and had to stop. Not because of snobbishness but because Matron was just too horrid!

      1. Enid Blyton never made it into our small town library, and although we discovered Edith Nesbett (who predated Blyton by a generation or two) when our girls were small (Anthea is named for the oldest child in “Five Children and It,” who Regina liked and we agreed was an admirable person), Enid Blyton still never made it into our ken.

        Just read a brief few paragraphs on Nesbet’s life and find that she was an even more interesting person than I knew.

        A great disappointment of my adult life was going back to re-read the “Girl of the Limberlost” stories that I identified from about age 8-12, and finding that the author was exceptionally racist, and that the heroine was almost impossibly righteous. I could not read them myself, and certainly not to our kids. Interesting that we and our societies have changed so much . . .

  2. You know, I am a little ashamed to say that I’ve never anything by Alexander McCall Smith, but you’re enjoyment of these novels leads me to think I ought to give him a try. The one featuring Detective Varg sounds very appealing – not too brutal or gruesome in style.

  3. I’ve tried a couple of McCall Smith titles now, one about Portuguese Irregular Verbs and another about Scotland Street (which we actually walked through when we visited Edinburgh) — but I regret to say I found them terribly slow going and gave up entirely on the first, and have faint hopes of possibly continuing with the second. Am I just too impatient a reader? I had to press the metaphorical pause button on Benson’s Queen Lucia for the same reason… 🙁

      1. To be fair I’m going through a phase of rereading mostly fantasy, which are my go-to comfort reads — I suppose they’re anchors in a time when I (we?) feel adrift subject to the winds and tides of universal pandemic, political corruption and extreme weather.

          1. Why do the wicked prosper? Simple: it’s not a level playing field. The wicked play dirty all the time whereas the just play by the rules — as a result they’re always trying to catch up. I’m not advocating playing them at their own game, just being realistic. (I’m not sure Jeremiah understood this…)

            1. If I can swerve off to another Biblical star. Job was a truly good man and he didn’t come off too well. (You can see my Biblical knowledge is sketchy…just the greatest hits.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s